Connect with us


Recall Of Governor Gavin Newsom Reaches Required Number Of Signatures



Governor Gavin Newsom (1)

The recall of Governor Gavin Newsom has met the required number of signatures on Monday becoming closer to being on the ballot.

California Secretary of State Dr. Shirley N. Weber has announced that the threshold of verified signatures reported by counties across the state has been met, triggering the next phase of the recall process.

A 30-business-day period in which voters may submit written requests to county Registrars of Voters to remove their names from the recall petition has now started, according to Weber’s office.

The valid signatures in the 10th report are 1,626,042, which exceeds the total of 1,495,709 signatures required. Counties still have until April 29 to verify the validity of any remaining signatures, according to the Secretary of State’s office. 

Any voter who has signed the recall petition may provide a written request to their county elections official to have their signature removed from the petition between April 26 and June 8, according to the election code.

If after this period the recall election still has a sufficient number of signatures, the Department of Finance will have 30 business days to estimate the cost of the recall election, according to the Secretary of State’s office. 

Following that, the Joint Legislative Budget Committee will have 30 calendar days to review and comment on those estimates before the lieutenant governor sets the date for the recall election.

The recall election must be held between 60 and 80 days from the date the Secretary of State certifies that it has qualified.

Additional information about the recall process, including calendar information, may be found here.


Revisitation Of Cannabis Ban In Unincorporated L.A. County Considered By Supervisors



Cannabis Marijuana Weed

A revisitation of the current ban on commercial cannabis production and distribution in unincorporated areas of Los Angeles County is being considered by the Board of Supervisors. 

The board voted unanimously on Tuesday to support a motion authored by Supervisor Janice Hahn and co-authored by Supervisor Hilda Solis that directs the Office of Cannabis Management to revisit the regulations.

Shortly after the passage of Proposition 64, the Adult Use of Marijuana Act, the supervisors enacted a ban on the commercial production and distribution of cannabis in unincorporated areas of the county. 

The ban was intended to be temporary until the County could develop and establish proper regulations, according to Hahn.

The board established the Office of Cannabis Management which convened a Working Group on Cannabis Regulation to develop recommendations for the board to consider. After conducting extensive community outreach and eight public convenings, the Working Group presented a report to the Board of Supervisors with 64 recommendations.

However, in June 2018, the Board of Supervisors chose to accept the report but not take any action to remove the cannabis ban. 

At the time, Hahn said the intention was not to rush the issue and felt there were “too many unanswered questions and uncertainties.”

In the three years since then, much has changed and evolved in the area of cannabis legalization. Multiple additional states have legalized recreational cannabis and the county’s two largest cities, Los Angeles and Long Beach are now allowing commercial cannabis.

“It has been three long years since we decided to keep the cannabis ban in place in the unincorporated area and a lot has changed,” said Hahn in a statement. “We’ve seen how legalization has played out in cities in our own county and we have seen states across the country move in the direction of legalizing, taxing, and regulating cannabis. It may be time for us to join them.”

The illegal production of cannabis has proliferated in unincorporated areas of L.A. County, including the Antelope Valley. 

Last month, over $1 billion of marijuana was seized in large-scale operations, some of which are connected to drug cartels, according to Sheriff Alex Villanueva. 

County officials hope to curb the growth of illegal activity in unincorporated areas by possibly lifting the current ban on legal production. 

The Office of Cannabis Management is set to report back to the board with updated recommendations for cannabis retail, manufacturing, distribution, growth, testing, regulation, and enforcement in Los Angeles County in 120 days.

Continue Reading


L.A. City Council Approves Plan To Divert $56.6 Million From LAPD



Crime LAPD Slider

The Los Angeles City Council approved a plan Tuesday to divert $56.6 million from the police department’s budget, investing the funds in community programs and alternatives to policing. 

Last year following the death of George Floyd and the movement to defund police, the City Council announced a plan to divert a total of $150 million from the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD). 

The funding is now expected to go toward anti-gang initiatives, homeless services, universal income programs, jobs initiatives and education.

Earlier this year, the City Council approved $32.2 million of the diverted funds. Mayor Eric Garcetti initially vetoed the proposal, however, later signed off on a revised plan the council approved.

Funds from both of the approved diversion plans are expected to be distributed equally across all districts of Los Angeles. 

City Council President Nury Martinez, who represents the east San Fernando Valley, has heard mixed support of the plan from the community.

Some communities “do want additional police officers. They feel safer that way,” Martinez said. “Some other communities don’t.”

In addition to the community programs, the plan allocated funds for “reimagined public safety” programs citywide, grant programs and quality of life services, according to the City report. 

The mayor still needs to sign off on the plan approved by the City Council.

Continue Reading


Los Angeles County Approves $1,000 Guaranteed Basic Income Pilot Program



The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors approved a motion Tuesday to develop a guaranteed basic income (GBI) pilot program.

The motion, co-authored by Supervisors Holly Mitchell and Sheila Kuehl, was passed by a 4-1 vote, with Supervisor Kathryn Barger opposing. 

Barger cited concerns that the pilot program was not fully researched and vetted to be implemented in a large county. 

Within 30 days, the county CEO is expected to establish the pilot program to serve at least 1,000 county residents for three years, according to the agenda.

A target population is set to receive, at a minimum, monthly income support of $1,000. Those in the pilot population are expected to include women living at or below the poverty level who were released from incarceration in the last seven years, transition-age youth head of households and domestic violence survivors.

On Monday, supervisors also passed a similar motion authored by Chair Hilda Solis aimed at creating a roadmap to implement the program.

“As the county transitions out of the COVID-19 pandemic, we will need to support the recovery of our residents coping with the disproportionate financial impact brought on by this past year to help rebuild our communities,” Solis said in a statement. “A well-crafted GBI program spearheaded by (Department of Public Social Services) has the potential to assist vulnerable populations to meet basic needs and be placed on a path to economic mobility.”

Governor Gavin Newsom’s May Revision Budget includes $35 million over five years to pay for universal basic income pilot programs. These pilot programs would be locally administered, require a local-match commitment, and target low-income residents, according to Solis.

The passage of the motion instructs the county’s Department of Public Social Services (DPSS), and in consultation with other departments as appropriate, to report back in 60 days on the process for implementing GBI, coordination with the state’s universal basic income program, what it takes to fund this program, any funding considerations, approvals needed, any required waivers, wrap-around services to enhance program outcomes including financial coaching and the populations that could be served.

To read the full motion by Mitchell and Kuehl, visit here. Solis’ motion can be found here

Continue Reading

Stay Connected



    Copyright © 2021 The Valley Post. All Rights Reserved.